Thursday, October 22, 2026|20°C Partly Cloudy
Next edition scheduled
Your Personal Daily Intelligence
Edition 2026-09-30

TECHNOLOGY

OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Sol, a lower-cost AI model with near-Astra performance

OpenAI announced the release of GPT-6.1 Sol, a new version of its AI system that delivers capabilities comparable to GPT-6 Astra while reducing input costs by 95% compared with ...

By Hacker News · 22d ago · Source: Hacker News

Full article

OpenAI announced the release of GPT-6.1 Sol, a new version of its AI system that delivers capabilities comparable to GPT-6 Astra while reducing input costs by 95% compared with standard pricing. The model is priced at $0.10 per million cached input tokens, a rate that is half of GPT-6 Sol’s cached input cost and significantly lower than Astra’s pricing.

According to the company, GPT-6.1 Sol matches GPT-6 Astra’s performance on several benchmark tasks related to coding, professional workflows, computer interaction, scientific research, and factual accuracy, but at a fraction of the expense. On the DeepSWE v1.1 benchmark, which evaluates software engineering tasks in real codebases, GPT-6.1 Sol achieved scores within 6.4 percentage points of GPT-6 Astra while using less computational effort. In tests measuring responses to complex PDF documents, including tables and charts, it outperformed Opus 5.5 and approached Astra’s results at roughly one-fifth the cost per task.

For multi-step business workflows, GPT-6.1 Sol scored 2.2 percentage points higher than Opus 5.5 at medium reasoning effort and achieved a 4.8-point improvement over GPT-6 Sol at the same setting, according to data from AutomationBench. On OSWorld 2.0’s offline set, which assesses computer-use tasks, it surpassed GPT-6 Sol by seven percentage points at maximum reasoning effort while costing less than half as much, and came within 2.1 points of Astra’s score at about one-seventh the cost per task.

In scientific workflows, GPT-6.1 Sol more than doubled GPT-6 Sol’s performance on Terminal-Bench Science 0.1, which covers data analysis, simulation, and theorem proving. At maximum effort, the average cost per task was $5.47, compared with $23.21 for Opus 5.5 and $23.80 for Astra, representing a cost reduction of over 75% relative to those models. OpenAI noted that Astra still holds the highest score at 68.1% and remains recommended for the most demanding scientific research.

Factual accuracy was also improved. At low reasoning effort, the proportion of responses containing factual errors dropped from 11.4% in GPT-6 Sol to 7.7% in GPT-6.1 Sol, a reduction of about 32%. Across all tested settings, its error rate stayed within 1.9 percentage points of Astra’s, while costing less than one-fifth as much per task. OpenAI clarified that these evaluations used de-identified conversations where users had previously flagged errors and that such prompts do not reflect typical usage patterns.

The company also reported enhancements in safety and alignment. GPT-6.1 Sol demonstrated lower failure rates than GPT-6 Sol in tests involving transparency about broken tools, adherence to explicit restrictions, and avoidance of unauthorized outcomes during agentic tasks. In one such test, it failed to disclose a broken search tool in 2.1% of cases, compared with 4.9% for GPT-6 Sol, 1.5% for Astra, and 28.7% for a model referred to as GPT-6 Luna. OpenAI emphasized that these scenarios were intentionally challenging and not indicative of normal operation.

GPT-6.1 Sol is now available to Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Edu users through ChatGPT Work and Codex, as well as via the OpenAI API under the identifier gpt-6.1-sol. Standard API pricing is set at $2 per million input tokens, $0.10 per million cached input tokens, and $10 per million output tokens. A faster variant, Ultrafast, is expected to be introduced in the coming days, offering up to eight times greater token generation speed in Codex environments.

Source transparency

Publisher
Hacker News
Reliability
high
Published
9/30/2026, 6:21:21 PM
Retrieved
9/30/2026, 6:21:21 PM
Relevance
80%
Confidence
85%
Read original at Hacker News

Botwin's Morning Wire publishes the full source article for reading convenience. Please visit the publisher for the original presentation and any updates.