CRYPTO
Bitcoin rebounds above $84,000 as oil dips on Middle East diplomatic progress
26d ago · coindesk
Edition · 2026-09-26
The White House announced on Friday that President Trump is canceling nearly $1 billion in spending that had been approved by Congress, invoking a rarely used authority that allows the administration to withhold funds for specific programs. The cuts target services for immigrants, including nonprofit organizations that assist refugees and unaccompanied minors who are in the country without legal authorization. The administration argues that the funding is no longer required because recent declines in illegal border crossings have reduced the need for such support. The Office of Management and Budget characterized the move as eliminating "the most harmful government spending."
Senator Susan Collins, a Republican who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee and is facing a competitive re-election campaign, criticized the action for lacking advance notice or consultation. She described the rescissions as an "impoundment" that bypasses congressional oversight and warned that it represents an "usurpation of Congress’s appropriations powers."
Senator Patty Murray, a Democrat and vice chair of the Appropriations Committee, called the cuts "theft from the American people," emphasizing that the funds had been approved on a bipartisan basis and were intended to aid vulnerable populations. She urged fellow Republicans who supported the original legislation to be outraged by what she described as an attempt to disregard their votes.
Congressional review of presidential spending reductions is typically possible before implementation, but Trump announced the cuts only five days before the end of the fiscal year, leaving little opportunity for oversight. The Government Accountability Office has previously labeled such maneuvers, known as "pocket rescissions," as illegal. Collins referred to the action as part of a broader pattern in which the administration seeks to erode Congress’s constitutional authority over the purse.
A similar pocket rescission was employed by Trump a year earlier, when he blocked $4.9 billion in foreign aid. The Supreme Court declined to intervene, citing the administration’s discretion in foreign affairs. This time, the targeted spending is domestic, marking an expansion of the tactic.
The White House has also taken steps that include firing federal employees, imposing heightened tariffs, and initiating military action in Iran without congressional authorization, raising questions about the limits of executive power and the role of the judiciary in checking those actions.
The federal government has begun broadcasting a taxpayer-funded advertisement on networks including Fox News that promotes Donald Trump ahead of the November midterm elections. The ad, which features the chorus of singer JMSN’s “Love Me,” is presented as a TikTok-style hype reel and includes the caption “Paid for by the US Government.” It aired during the Jesse Watters program on Fox News. According to AdImpact, which monitors media spending, the cost of the advertisement has increased from $14,000 to $430,000 as it runs across multiple television markets nationwide. The White House describes the spot as a public service announcement intended to remind Americans “to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad.” A White House spokesperson stated the ad is educational and unapologetically patriotic. JMSN has publicly criticized the use of his song in the advertisement. Several politicians from both parties have issued letters condemning the use of public funds for the promotion. Previous administrations have also produced government-funded public service announcements, including a 2021 joint effort by former presidents to encourage COVID-19 vaccination and a 2014 PSA featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger under George H.W. Bush. Unlike those efforts, the current advertisement focuses primarily on Trump without conveying a broader civic message.
The Supreme Court on Friday declined to revive a Republican‑backed congressional map for Missouri, leaving the state’s election officials to continue using the 2022‑era districts for the upcoming midterms. The decision closes a legal battle that began after the court had previously blocked the new map and allowed a citizen‑initiated referendum to block its implementation.
The justices issued an unsigned opinion stating that ordering a switch to a new map at this stage would create electoral confusion. They emphasized that the Missouri Supreme Court’s earlier ruling, which required the referendum to be decided by voters in November, must remain in place.
The conflict originated when Missouri legislators, prompted by former President Donald Trump and Governor Mike Kehoe, approved revised districts aimed at increasing the party’s chances of winning additional House seats. The proposal reshaped the Kansas City‑based 5th District, previously represented by Democrat Emanuel Cleaver, by moving portions of the city into neighboring Republican‑leaning districts and extending the district into rural areas. According to an Associated Press estimate, about 59 % of voters in that district would have been new to it under the revised lines.
Republican officials had argued that using the new map for the August primaries was permissible, but a panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that changing district boundaries between the primary and general elections violated the Constitution. The appeals court ordered a district judge to block the use of any map other than the new one, though the order was delayed to allow a Supreme Court review.
Legal filings show that at least 16 lawsuits have been filed over Missouri’s redistricting, making it one of the most contested states in the nation. The Missouri Supreme Court initially allowed the new map to be used while petition signatures were verified, but later concluded that a referendum petition concerning congressional redistricting was valid and ordered Secretary of State Denny Hoskins not to adopt the new districts.
Hoskins rejected the petition on August 4, the deadline for the primary election, asserting that referendum petitions cannot be used for congressional redistricting. The Missouri Supreme Court ruled on September 3 that the petition was valid and directed Hoskins to use the 2022 districts. The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked a conflicting order from a federal district judge, and subsequent appeals led to the latest Supreme Court decision.
The prolonged litigation has left more than a million Missouri voters uncertain about which districts they will vote in, as absentee voting began under the 2022 maps while the legal dispute unfolded. Republican candidates Rick Brattin and Bob Onder, who had challenged the map in federal court, remain on the ballot despite the district boundaries reverting to their previous configuration.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene underscores the limited role federal courts play in reshaping state congressional maps close to an election, and it leaves the ultimate decision to Missouri voters, who will decide the fate of the proposed map in the November referendum.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham described Jaguar Land Rover and the broader West Midlands automotive sector as the crown jewel of the UK economy during a BBC interview on Tuesday.
By · 26d ago · Source: bbc
Prime Minister Andy Burnham described Jaguar Land Rover and the broader West Midlands automotive sector as the crown jewel of the UK economy during a BBC interview on Tuesday.
Burnham emphasized the government's commitment to sustaining mass car production domestically, stating it was collaborating with the European Union to prevent new regulatory frameworks from disadvantaging British manufacturers. He affirmed that concerns raised by industry stakeholders would be taken seriously, with the automotive sector remaining a top priority.
The prime minister highlighted ongoing efforts to address pressures within the global car market, particularly regarding proposed EU "Made in Europe" regulations designed to shield European manufacturers from international competition. Burnham warned that excluding UK firms from these frameworks could disrupt supply chains, a risk he said the government was actively working to mitigate.
Jaguar Land Rover suppliers recently issued an open letter cautioning that the British automotive supply chain was misaligned with emerging market demands, urging a strategic pivot toward aerospace and defence sectors. They identified JLR's announced job cuts—targeting 4,000 positions—as an early indicator of systemic vulnerabilities, noting that the supply chain supports approximately 183,000 manufacturing roles across the West Midlands and Merseyside.
JLR maintains global headquarters in Coventry, with manufacturing facilities in Solihull, Castle Bromwich, Wolverhampton, and Halewood. Its design centre operates in Gaydon, Warwickshire. Burnham confirmed he would evaluate the suppliers' proposal while reaffirming support for the core automotive industry.
The government has previously proposed measures such as targeted grants, reduced energy costs, and electric vehicle investment to bolster the sector. Burnham linked these initiatives to a broader reindustrialization agenda, stating that previous administrations had allowed key industries in the West Midlands and North West to decline unchecked during the 1980s.
He emphasized a commitment to preventing similar outcomes, asserting that the current administration would not permit critical industries to be abandoned. "Supporting industrial transition" is framed as a cornerstone of this policy, with the prime minister pledging to prioritize growth across all regions of the country.
Burnham concluded by underscoring the strategic importance of the automotive sector to national economic resilience, describing it as a foundational element of the UK's industrial future.
A researcher at Anthropic, Jacob Coxon, resigned in early December and warned on X that some AI developers believe the technology could pose an existential risk within a decade. Around the same time, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, published an essay urging a slower pace of AI development to allow risk mitigation to keep up with capability advances. These warnings emerged as the Trump administration advanced a new international effort, Pax Silica, aimed at securing access to critical minerals needed for artificial intelligence infrastructure. The initiative, led by Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and Environment Jacob Helberg, seeks to establish a coalition of nations to control supply chains for rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt, and copper—materials essential for AI hardware. The Philippines joined the initiative in April, becoming one of 24 signatories, including Australia, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the United Kingdom, Israel, and members of the European Union. The declaration emphasizes collaboration between private industry and governments to enhance economic security and supply chain resilience. A central component of Pax Silica is a planned 4,000-acre economic zone in New Clark City, Philippines, within the Luzon Economic Corridor. The zone, developed in partnership with the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines, will focus on semiconductor manufacturing, data centers, and supply chain logistics. It is positioned near deposits of nickel, cobalt, and copper, minerals critical to battery and AI infrastructure. Companies operating in the zone will receive up to seven years of tax exemption, followed by reduced rates, and can secure 99-year land leases with expedited regulatory approvals. Up to 90 percent of employees may work remotely, a feature designed to attract U.S. firms seeking to avoid relocation. The project has drawn attention for its potential ties to Silicon Valley networks. Helberg previously served as a senior adviser to Palantir’s CEO and has financial ties to venture capital firms including Founders Fund and Khosla Ventures. His husband, Keith Rabois, holds stakes in multiple Founders Fund entities and leads a $15 billion investment firm. Helberg’s political affiliations have shifted from supporting Democratic candidates in 2019 to donating $1 million to the Trump campaign by 2024. He has cited concerns about what he describes as the Democratic Party’s shift toward identity-based politics and lack of support for Israel. In a 2024 interview, he stated that American Jews supporting President Biden should reconsider their stance, arguing that support for Israel aligns with a single political choice in that election cycle. Helberg joined the State Department in late 2025 after being nominated by President Trump and confirmed by the Senate in October of that year. His career has included roles at Google, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, and the Hill and Valley Forum, an annual gathering of lawmakers and AI industry executives focused on countering Chinese influence in technology. The ideological foundation for Pax Silica appears to draw from concepts like Balaji Srinivasan’s “Network State,” which envisions autonomous economic zones operating outside traditional national governance. Próspera, a special economic zone in Honduras, has served as a model, offering regulatory flexibility drawn from 36 jurisdictions. However, Próspera has faced legal challenges, including a 2024 ruling by the Honduran Supreme Court declaring autonomous zones unconstitutional. It continues to operate under a legal gray area, with ongoing litigation over land use and governance. Indigenous Garífuna communities in Honduras have raised concerns about water access and decision-making power within the zone. Critics of Pax Silica warn that similar models could be replicated in the Philippines with limited environmental and labor protections, potentially repeating patterns of economic exploitation. Indigenous and labor groups in the Philippines have organized protests against the initiative, arguing that the country risks becoming a site for foreign-controlled industrial zones with minimal local benefit. In May, the Philippine government denied a U.S. request for diplomatic immunity for personnel operating in the special economic zone, signaling sensitivity to sovereignty concerns. The initiative has received public endorsement from White House AI and crypto advisor David Sacks and Senator Jim Risch, who described Pax Silica as evidence of the importance of forward-looking diplomatic strategy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also praised Helberg’s work, calling the initiative central to strengthening partnerships in mining and AI infrastructure. A State Department spokesperson confirmed that Helberg adheres to an ethics agreement to manage potential conflicts of interest. Helberg has defended the initiative against criticism, stating that participation in U.S.-led supply chains offers economic advantages and that concerns about dependency reflect a misunderstanding of technological interdependence. The broader context of Pax Silica reflects a strategic push by the administration to secure technological leadership amid growing competition with China, particularly in AI and semiconductor development. While the administration emphasizes national security and economic strength, critics argue that the pace and structure of these initiatives prioritize geopolitical dominance over transparency, accountability, and equitable development. The long-term impact of Pax Silica and similar projects remains uncertain, particularly as public sentiment toward both AI and the current administration shifts. The initiative continues to attract investment and partnership discussions, though the identities of specific companies involved have not yet been disclosed. Its success will depend on international coordination, regulatory frameworks, and the ability to balance innovation with ethical and environmental considerations.
A coalition of seven Blizzard Entertainment unions ratified a contract that guarantees workers a role in shaping artificial intelligence deployment across the studio. The agreement, reached after months of negotiations, includes provisions for impact bargaining on AI use throughout the four-year term. Senior designer Paul Cox noted that the clause emerged from concerns about AI potentially displacing creative roles, stating that workers wanted to ensure technological changes would not undermine job security. The contract also establishes wage increases, remote work protections, and job security safeguards. This development follows Microsoft's broader layoffs affecting 1,600 Xbox employees and smaller cuts at Blizzard, though the company emphasized these reductions were unrelated to the union negotiations. The agreement marks a significant shift in an industry historically resistant to collective bargaining, with union leaders highlighting its potential to set precedents for other studios. Workers involved in the negotiations noted increased solidarity during the final bargaining session, which spanned 70 hours over five days. The contract's AI provisions come amid industry-wide tensions over automation, exemplified by Electronic Arts' recent workforce reductions tied to AI adoption. While the agreement does not resolve all labor concerns, it represents a concrete step toward addressing technological disruption through collective bargaining rather than unilateral corporate decisions.
SpaceX has stacked the Starship vehicle ahead of Flight 14, marking continued progress toward its next orbital test.
The company's move to pause Falcon 9 production reflects a broader industry shift. Executives across the launch sector note that years of low-cost, high-reliability access to space have reshaped market expectations, prompting calls for new business models. At a Paris conference, Firefly Aerospace's vice president of strategy Michael Creech described the situation as a "reset," stating that customers had grown accustomed to a pricing structure that did not reflect true launch costs. "The customer got comfortable with a high reliability and a low price," he said during a panel discussion reported by Via Satellite. "That frankly did not support the launch market."
Regulatory approval remains a bottleneck for Starship's next flight. The Federal Aviation Administration must clear the mission before liftoff, which could occur as early as September 28 from Starbase in Texas. The flight would carry 26 Version 3 Starlink satellites into orbit, with a planned duration near 10 hours.
Smaller players are advancing their timelines amid the changing landscape. HyPrSpace, a French startup, delayed its Baguette One suborbital test to 2027, citing site preparation at Biscarrosse. The 10-meter vehicle uses a hybrid propulsion system combining liquid oxygen with solid fuel. Meanwhile, Astra targets an early 2027 debut for Rocket 4.0, an 18.9-meter vehicle designed to deliver up to one metric ton to low-Earth orbit. CEO Chris Kemp emphasized a focus on affordability and reliability over reusability, describing the rocket as "a soda can" built to last.
Environmental concerns are mounting over orbital congestion. The European Space Agency's latest Space Environment Report projects significantly higher satellite densities in the coming years, even under optimistic operational scenarios. Researchers warn that without stricter end-of-life protocols, the risk of Kessler syndrome collisions increases. The report also notes a new category of orbital data centers not yet factored into long-term modeling.
Ariane 6 faces technical delays that could affect European launch schedules. An issue with turbopumps discovered during ground testing in August may push the year's launch total below initial targets. The setback impacts commercial customers, including Amazon's Project Kuiper, which had planned to use Ariane 6 for part of its constellation deployment.
Chinese firm Space Epoch secured over $340 million in Series B funding to advance development of the Yuanxingzhe-1 rocket. The medium-lift vehicle can lift 13.8 metric tons to low-Earth orbit and has demonstrated vertical landing capabilities in suborbital tests. An orbital flight is expected before year's end.
The era of commoditized launch services appears to be ending. As major providers scale back or delay systems, emerging companies are positioning themselves around performance and sustainability rather than price competition. Whether this shift leads to greater diversity in launch capabilities or further consolidation remains uncertain.
Eric Berger covers aerospace for Ars Technica, focusing on space exploration and launch industry developments. He is the author of two books on space history and technology.
Hurricane Polo underwent explosive intensification in the eastern Pacific in late September 2026, reaching Category 5 status in less than 24 hours. The storm originated as a tropical disturbance off Mexico's Pacific coast in mid-September and became a tropical depression on September 20, followed by tropical storm status on September 21.
By September 22, Polo's maximum sustained winds increased by 90 knots (167 km/h or 104 mph) within a single day, meeting the technical definition of extreme rapid intensification. The National Hurricane Center described the strengthening as "truly remarkable" in its advisory discussions. NOAA's Hurricane Hunter aircraft measured winds near 285 km/h (180 mph) on that date, placing Polo among the strongest eastern Pacific storms on record.
Meteorologists noted that Polo developed in an environment with favorable conditions for intensification: low wind shear, high moisture, warm ocean temperatures, and high atmospheric instability. Sea surface temperatures in the region reached 32°C (90°F), approximately 2-3 degrees above the 2003-2014 average for late September. The storm passed over waters with high ocean heat content, which likely contributed to its sustained strength.
Satellite imagery captured on September 23 showed a large, clear eye and extensive outflow pattern as Polo churned off Guerrero, southwest of Acapulco. At that time, it maintained Category 4 intensity with winds of 230 km/h (145 mph), having recently completed an eyewall replacement cycle that caused a temporary weakening.
Experts cautioned against directly linking Polo's development to El Niño, though the broader regional context featured above-average tropical cyclone activity. Colorado State University data indicated the accumulated cyclone energy in the eastern Pacific was nearly double the seasonal norm as of September 24. The storm was expected to remain over the Pacific through the following week, with potential for a northeastward trajectory toward Baja California.
NASA Earth Observatory documented Polo's evolution using MODIS satellite imagery and sea surface temperature data from the Multiscale Ultrahigh Resolution (MUR) project. Researchers emphasized that while warm surface waters were a factor, the depth of ocean heat also played a role, with minimal cooling observed in the storm's wake.
Forecasters monitored Polo's progression using NASA's Worldview browser and GMAO's FLUID tool. The storm's rapid intensification occurred without direct attribution to El Niño conditions, though the overall seasonal activity aligned with patterns observed during El Niño events.
Current and former FBI personnel voiced shock, fear and anger after a hack exposed personal details of thousands of agents.
The breach, attributed to the cybercriminal group ShinyHunters, reportedly compromised names, home addresses, phone numbers, badge numbers, job titles and medical notes belonging to FBI staff, including senior officials. Samples of the stolen data were shared with media outlets, and the group threatened to publish the full dataset within four days unless its demands were met.
One former cyber investigator, speaking through a group chat with active agents, said the leak put undercover operatives at risk of physical harm and targeted harassment. Agents feared that criminals could use the information to craft convincing phishing scams, demand bribes or carry out "violence-as-a-service" attacks against them and their families.
The FBI confirmed the incident and said it was "aggressively investigating" the breach. Former FBI Deputy Director Cynthia Kaiser warned that the data may already be circulating in online forums, potentially causing damage before any public release. She noted that past breaches have shown stolen information can remain active on the dark web for years.
Michael McPherson, a retired FBI agent now working in cybersecurity, described the breach as a "security threat which cuts to the core of agent safety." He highlighted concerns that family members of agents, who are typically insulated from operational risks, could now be exposed.
Reactions among current and former staff included anger toward the agency’s security practices. A former cyber agent described the alleged failures as "sloppy and lazy," noting that the breach was particularly embarrassing given the FBI’s reputation for technical capability. The group behind the hack, ShinyHunters, is not considered highly sophisticated, yet managed to infiltrate FBI systems.
The FBI has not responded to requests for comment. Instead, some employees were advised to use DeleteMe, a service that removes personal data from online broker sites, a measure viewed by insiders as insufficient. Former officials said the incident could complicate leadership matters for FBI Director Kash Patel, whose tenure has already faced scrutiny.
Experts warned that the breach might increase the risk of recruitment attempts by hostile foreign intelligence services, as adversaries could identify and target agents using the leaked information. While the FBI is expected to pursue the perpetrators, the episode has sparked broader concerns about the agency’s ability to protect sensitive data.
A jury in Santa Fe reached a verdict on Friday finding Facebook liable for deceiving users about privacy protections tied to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The decision now moves to a judge who will determine the monetary penalty, with prosecutors seeking the maximum $5,000 per violation allowed under state law. The two‑week trial centered on accusations that the platform misled users about a data breach involving a third‑party personality quiz that harvested information from roughly 87 million profiles and transferred it to Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm that worked on the 2016 Trump campaign. Evidence presented showed the breach affected the entire New Mexico population of more than two million residents. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez said the verdict affirmed that no company is above the rules that protect consumers, calling it a historic step for the state and others pursuing accountability from major tech firms. The same jury also concluded that Facebook misrepresented investigations into data brokers after the scandal, finding the company responsible for more than two million violations. During closing arguments, Facebook's legal team argued that the state's evidence was outdated and that, after five years of investigation, only a single additional breach had been uncovered. A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the company disagrees with the jury's findings and will continue to defend its position, emphasizing that free‑speech considerations were central to the case. The spokesperson added that the firm prioritizes user control over data and maintains that it operates within First Amendment boundaries. Meta recently settled a multistate lawsuit for up to $18 billion related to child‑safety concerns, and the settlement includes a provision that releases the company from future liability on the Cambridge Analytica breach, leaving New Mexico as the sole state to pursue its own case. Earlier this year, New Mexico secured $942 million in judgments against Meta from a separate trial over inadequate safeguards for minors, and the court ordered the implementation of new safeguards such as age‑verification tools and usage time limits. Torrez concluded with a warning to all technology firms operating in the state: deceptive conduct regarding user data will be met with legal consequences.
This edition was assembled from neutral, full-length rewritten articles of the day's aggregated news.
Why it matters: Every article was reviewed for loaded language, partisan framing, and missing attribution before publication.