BUSINESS
Wall Street falls as AI debt concerns and rising oil prices weigh on markets
5d ago · reuters
← All editions
Edition · 2026-10-17
More Top Stories
Rockstar Games plans to release GTA 6 on November 19 for PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X|S. The title follows a decade of anticipation and carries significant commercial expectations.
The previous Rockstar launch, GTA 5, generated $800 million in revenue within its first 24 hours and reached $1 billion in three days. It has since sold over 230 million copies. Red Dead Redemption II earned $725 million during its opening weekend and has sold more than 87 million copies. Bethesda's Fallout 4 launched with $750 million in sales on its first day.
GTA 6 is expected to surpass these figures. Sensor Tower projects 25 million preorders by launch, which could translate to approximately $2 billion in revenue. This estimate assumes an average price of $80 for the base edition and $100 for the premium version. The game's higher base price reflects current market conditions, though inflation-adjusted comparisons to earlier launches remain complex.
Take-Two Interactive has not disclosed official preorder numbers. CEO Strauss Zelnick stated that sharing raw data could mislead investors, emphasizing that demand patterns are unprecedented. He noted that preorders remain cancellable and that no units have technically been sold yet.
Sensor Tower's analysis indicates 6.08 million preorders through October 13, generating an estimated $594 million in revenue. The split shows 74% for PlayStation 5 and 26% for Xbox Series X|S. Reorders are expected to peak in the final week before launch.
GTA 6 will initially launch as a single-player experience on consoles, though a future version of GTA Online is anticipated. Take-Two's stock is currently trading near $200 per share, with analysts projecting potential growth to $300, driven by expectations around GTA 6 and its online component.
The console market context differs from GTA 5's release, which benefited from the final years of the PS3 and Xbox 360 generations, collectively reaching over 150 million units. Today's PS5 and Xbox Series X|S installations exceed 120 million combined, though hardware costs remain elevated due to global supply factors.
Long-term sales projections suggest GTA 6 may not surpass GTA 5's lifetime sales, which stand at over 230 million copies. However, its extended console lifecycle and potential for future ports, including possible PC and Switch 2 versions, could influence its trajectory.
Rockstar has not confirmed a Switch 2 release, though internal testing has been reported. Nintendo's president has encouraged fans to direct inquiries to Rockstar regarding platform availability.
The game's monetization strategy may emphasize user-generated content and expanded online features, potentially creating new revenue streams beyond the core title.
For consumers considering hardware upgrades, the cost of a base PS5 or Xbox Series S may present a barrier, with prices exceeding $500 for some configurations.
Updates on GTA 6 will be tracked through ongoing coverage.
A recent New York Times report highlighted remarks made by former Fox News host Tucker Carlson during a National Public Radio interview that sparked attention for their tone and framing. The piece described Carlson as an "influential far-right podcaster" known for rhetoric described by critics as nativist, including past statements characterizing immigration as making the United States "poorer and dirtier." Carlson had previously referred to Republican Congressman Mike Rogers as a "toady to Israel" and "embodiment of the cruelty and stupidity of the national security state." A few days after the Times story, National Public Radio identified Carlson as a "Newsmaker"—one of "the most influential people of our time"—and aired an hourlong interview conducted by host Steve Inskeep. At the opening of the conversation, Inskeep described Carlson as a commentator who "has commanded an audience for decades as a cable TV pundit, as a Fox News star, and then, after his firing, as the head of an independent network frequently broadcasting from this barn in Maine." During the interview, Carlson asserted that President Donald Trump should be removed from office for initiating what he called "the most profoundly destructive thing any—any single decision a president has made in our history," referring to the decision to launch military action against Iran. Carlson also criticized Israel and its influence on U.S. policy, denied being antisemitic, and accused Trump of corruption. He described the Trump-Russia investigation as a "totally absurd plot to discredit Trump." At the conclusion of the interview, Inskeep remarked, "You’re a thoughtful guy." In both the Times article and the NPR interview, Carlson’s most controversial positions were presented with limited context. The Times noted Carlson’s embrace of conspiracy theories, allegations of antisemitism, and a past interview with Nick Fuentes, a figure known for Holocaust denial. However, the coverage did not fully detail the breadth of his past statements. Two years prior, Carlson praised Darryl Cooper, a historian associated with far-right circles, describing him as "the most important popular historian working in the United States today." Cooper has advanced interpretations of World War II that align with Nazi apologist narratives, including claims that Winston Churchill was the primary architect of the conflict and that the Holocaust resulted from logistical failures rather than systematic intent. Carlson has also promoted the "great replacement theory," a conspiracy framework asserting that white Americans are being demographically displaced by non-white migrants, a concept adopted by some extremist groups. He has supported narratives questioning the integrity of the 2020 U.S. election and described participants in the January 6 Capitol attack as "right" to believe the election was stolen, despite private reservations about election denial claims. Carlson has also hosted guests on his podcast who espouse antisemitic views and has amplified narratives originating from Russian state media. In 2022, he appeared on RT, a Russian state-funded outlet, where he claimed that elements within the U.S. government were using "mass migration" to undermine the "English-speaking West" and provoke conflict with Russia. During that appearance, he described Russia as "a beautiful country, an amazing country, my favorite country I’ve ever visited," while omitting discussion of the ongoing war in Ukraine, civilian casualties, or the displacement of Ukrainian children. He characterized Ukraine as a "client state of NATO and the United States" rather than a sovereign nation defending its sovereignty. Carlson has also faced legal scrutiny: a former booker and producer filed a lawsuit alleging bullying and antisemitic remarks during her tenure on his Fox News program. Fox News settled the case for $12 million, according to the plaintiff’s attorney. In 2023, Carlson promoted a controversial practice referred to as "testicle tanning" during a broadcast. Media analysts have noted that while Carlson maintains a significant audience, his rhetorical patterns include the repetition of unverified claims, the elevation of fringe figures, and the framing of adversarial relationships in ways that align with authoritarian or conspiratorial worldviews. His appearances on platforms with documented ties to foreign influence operations have drawn scrutiny for normalizing discourse that omits key geopolitical realities. Earlier this month, Carlson engaged in a public exchange with British politician Jacob Rees-Mogg, during which he questioned the United Kingdom’s entry into World War II and suggested that linguistic shifts in Britain would be inconsequential. Rees-Mogg responded by stating Carlson was "verging on defending Hitler," a characterization Carlson met with a rhetorical reply: "Yeah, I guess I’m just a secret Nazi." The exchange underscored a pattern in which Carlson’s remarks intersect with historical revisionism and rhetoric that minimizes the actions of authoritarian regimes. Journalists and commentators have observed that extensive media exposure does not necessarily equate to factual legitimacy, and that the presentation of controversial figures without sufficient contextual framing may inadvertently amplify narratives that lack empirical support. Carlson has not provided a detailed public response to these critiques. His continued presence in media spaces remains a subject of discussion among observers of political communication and digital discourse.
Altadena, California — More than 1,400 households affected by the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires will lose access to disaster case managers by the end of October as a funding dispute between the state and the Federal Emergency Management Agency remains unresolved.
Mary Landau, a 78-year-old retired teacher who lived in her Altadena home for nearly five decades, said the case manager assigned to her recovery efforts provided essential support after the Eaton Fire destroyed her house. "She said, 'You can do this,'" Landau recalled. "She gave me hope and strength."
Case managers like Veda Ashby Romero, a recovery specialist with the nonprofit CORE, assist survivors in navigating insurance claims, completing federal forms, and accessing financial aid. They also help identify scams, challenge insurance payouts, and appeal FEMA decisions. For Landau, who faced a $200,000 shortfall in rebuilding her modest 1938 ranch home and still owed $225,000 on her mortgage, this support was critical.
The program, which served approximately 1,400 households across the region, was funded through a $28 million request by California. FEMA allocated $13.2 million for 24 months, to be disbursed in four installments. As of August, only one payment had been made, forcing the state to cover the remaining costs despite repeated requests for reimbursement. A March request for an additional $6.5 million to sustain the program for the full two-year period went unanswered, leaving 700 households on a waiting list.
With no resolution in sight, California announced in late September that it could no longer subsidize the program and would terminate case management services at the end of October. FEMA later confirmed it had reimbursed outstanding payments but had not approved the supplemental funding request.
Congresswoman Judy Chu, who represents the Altadena area, stated that FEMA had not responded to inquiries from her office regarding the additional funding. "Failing to fund the program the full 24 months risks abandoning survivors," she said.
Nonprofits managing the case load are now working to reassign clients to other organizations using limited philanthropic resources. However, officials warn that demand exceeds capacity. "You can't put everything onto the local nonprofits," said Bree Jensen, spokesperson for the Eaton Fire Collaborative.
The situation underscores broader challenges in the federal disaster response framework. Despite President Donald Trump’s campaign promises to streamline recovery efforts, his administration has not yet submitted a supplemental disaster aid request to Congress for the LA fires. The White House has instead emphasized state-level mismanagement, with spokesperson Lauren Bis calling Governor Gavin Newsom’s $15.7 billion request an attempt "to pass the blame for his horrible mismanagement of the LA wildfires and recovery efforts."
For survivors like Landau, the loss of case management support comes at a critical juncture. She remains in the process of securing final insurance payments and mortgage approvals to rebuild on her property. While she leans on family for emotional support, she said the personal connection with her case manager made a tangible difference.
"To meet with somebody who cares about you, wants to see that you land on your feet in a good situation," she said, "it was so important."
The standoff reflects ongoing tensions between federal and state agencies over disaster funding priorities and administrative responsibilities. As thousands of survivors continue to rebuild, the uncertainty surrounding case management services highlights the fragility of support systems in the aftermath of large-scale disasters.
Americans will vote on 3 November to determine control of Congress for the remainder of Donald Trump's presidency, a contest that could reshape his final two years in office.
By · 5d ago · Source: bbc
Americans will vote on 3 November to determine control of Congress for the remainder of Donald Trump's presidency, a contest that could reshape his final two years in office. All 435 House seats and 33 of the 100 Senate seats are up for election, with Republicans currently holding narrow majorities in both chambers. The outcome hinges on voter response to Trump's declining approval ratings, which have dropped from over 50% at the start of his second term to approximately 37% amid ongoing economic concerns and foreign policy challenges. Historically, the president's party loses an average of 27 House seats in midterms, a trend that favors Democrats seeking to reclaim the House, where they need to flip four of 16 Republican-held toss-up districts. In the Senate, Democrats face a tougher path, requiring wins in seven competitive races including key contests in Michigan, Alaska, Iowa, Ohio, and Texas, where incumbent Republican Ken Paxton is defending his seat against Democrat James Talarico. Financial disparities are pronounced, with Republicans reporting over $600 million in combined cash reserves versus Democrats' $400 million, and GOP groups spending $200 million more on advertising in September. Trump's focus on reducing fuel costs contrasts with voter concerns about inflation, healthcare costs, and immigration policy, issues that have shaped campaign messaging across battleground states. The results will influence not only Trump's legislative agenda but also the political landscape for the 2028 presidential election, as both parties prepare for shifting voter priorities beyond his tenure.
A recent Bloomberg report revealed that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission was instructed to halt an investigation into potential insider trading involving oil transactions that occurred shortly before the president posted social media messages about Iran. The directive came from a senior adviser to the agency's Trump-appointed chair, who ordered investigators to withdraw a referral to legal counsel. This development is part of a broader pattern in which enforcement of financial crimes has declined during the second Trump administration, affecting agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Justice Department, and the White House.
Data from the SEC indicates that enforcement actions dropped by nearly 30 percent in fiscal year 2025 compared to the previous year, with only five new cases brought in the first half of the fiscal year—the lowest count in at least 16 years. The agency also dismissed a case against the crypto exchange Coinbase and paused a prosecution involving a Chinese cryptocurrency entrepreneur linked to a Trump family venture. In May, the White House granted a pardon to Binance and its former CEO.
Eugene Soltes, a Harvard Business School professor specializing in white-collar crime, noted that while some reduction in enforcement is typical after a presidential transition, the current decline exceeds historical norms. He described the administration as adopting a "lighter-touch approach" to corporate accountability, citing public statements supporting reduced regulatory burdens.
In early 2025, the president signed an executive order pausing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a law designed to prevent U.S. companies from bribing foreign officials. The order was lifted in June with revised guidance that would limit FCPA enforcement to cases where foreign bribery harms a U.S. business competitor. The SEC has also proposed eliminating the "pay-to-play" rule, which restricts private investment firms from accessing public pension funds, and scaled back requirements for disclosing shareholder concerns in corporate filings.
The Justice Department has restructured its approach to corporate crime under Attorney General Todd Blanche, consolidating divisions focused on financial misconduct into a new National Fraud Enforcement Division. This unit will prioritize healthcare fraud, trade fraud, tax evasion, and misuse of government benefits, with Vice President JD Vance overseeing related initiatives. The administration has cited $260 billion in alleged federal benefit fraud as justification for the shift.
Experts warn that reduced enforcement may have long-term consequences. Brandon Garrett, a Duke Law School professor tracking corporate prosecutions, stated that the Justice Department has significantly altered its handling of financial crime, with corporate prosecutions now a lower priority. Historical precedents, such as the deregulation of savings and loan institutions in the 1970s and the lax oversight that preceded the Enron collapse and the 2008 financial crisis, suggest that diminished regulatory action can precede systemic risks. Garrett noted that while enforcement declines do not immediately lead to fraud, they often reflect a cultural shift that reduces investment in compliance infrastructure.
The administration's actions have drawn scrutiny from lawmakers, including Senators Jack Reed and Elizabeth Warren, who expressed concern over the departure of the SEC's enforcement division director after six months in office and a 17 percent decline in staffing within the corporate oversight arm. While some reduction in enforcement activity is expected during administrative transitions, analysts emphasize the need to monitor whether current trends signal a sustained weakening of accountability mechanisms.
A recent Los Angeles Times poll revealed a significant shift in the city's mayoral race, showing councilmember Nithya Raman gaining 11 points over incumbent mayor Karen Bass. Bass responded by emphasizing her administration's construction of over 10,000 affordable housing units and her commitment to accelerating housing production. Raman, an urban planner with a platform centered on expanding housing supply, has positioned herself as the candidate advocating for increased development. This development has made housing a defining issue in both the Los Angeles mayoral contest and a competitive San Francisco congressional race. In San Francisco, state Senator Scott Wiener is challenging Supervisor Connie Chan for a U.S. House seat previously held by Nancy Pelosi. Wiener, known for advancing legislation requiring communities to approve more housing near transit corridors, has garnered support for his pro-housing stance. Chan has faced criticism for opposing several housing and transit measures, citing concerns about displacement, historical preservation, and neighborhood character. The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board recently described her record as "abysmal" in the context of the city's housing crisis. California's housing deficit remains a point of contention, with state officials reporting an average of 80,000 new homes built annually against a target of 180,000. Approximately one-third of renters in the state spend more than half their income on housing, and the state accounts for 12 percent of the U.S. population while housing 22 percent of the nation's unhoused individuals. Both races feature Democratic candidates, with their divergence lying in approaches to housing development and the definition of "affordable" housing. Wiener identifies as a YIMBY (Yes in My Backyard), advocating for streamlined approval processes for new construction, particularly near transit hubs. His advocacy led to the passage of SB79, which limits local opposition to certain housing projects. Chan's campaign has emphasized tenant protections and infrastructure considerations alongside new construction, arguing for a more cautious approach. Her campaign director noted that opposition to new housing often involves concerns about community impact beyond mere resistance. Political dynamics in San Francisco reflect a tension between progressive ideals and local resistance to change, with some observers noting historical patterns of environmental advocacy that prevented extensive development while also contributing to current housing shortages. In Los Angeles, the housing debate has unfolded differently, with Raman aligning with progressive housing advocacy despite initial reservations from groups like the Democratic Socialists of America. Incumbent Bass had previously implemented policies to streamline housing approvals, including an executive directive that facilitated the construction of over 10,000 units. However, the policy faced backlash in wealthier neighborhoods, leading to modifications that excluded certain areas. Raman's campaign has positioned itself as supporting housing development across all price points and neighborhoods, contrasting with Bass's more cautious approach. A recent poll indicated that 26 percent of respondents identified building affordable housing as a top priority for the next mayor, alongside 32 percent who prioritized housing homeless individuals. Housing affordability and availability remain critical concerns, with California experiencing significant rent increases and high home prices. The state's housing challenges are interconnected with broader issues including homelessness, economic inequality, and urban planning strategies. Political scientists note that while housing policy often transcends traditional ideological divides, it frequently becomes entangled with local property values and neighborhood aesthetics. Public opinion surveys suggest a complex relationship between housing preferences and policy support, with many expressing support for housing affordability in principle while resisting specific development projects in their communities. The ongoing debates in these races highlight the difficulty of balancing urgent housing needs with community concerns about growth and change.
New campaign finance filings reveal stark disparities in fundraising between Democratic and Republican Senate candidates in key battleground states.
Democratic candidates raised substantially more money than their Republican opponents across multiple competitive Senate contests during the July-to-September period. In Texas, Democrat James Talarico raised $60.2 million compared to Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton’s $10.2 million in main campaign accounts. Georgia Senator Jon Ossoff collected $33.1 million versus Republican Mike Collins’ $2.8 million. In North Carolina, Governor Roy Cooper raised $12.2 million to Michael Whatley’s $2.1 million. Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed outraised Mike Rogers $33 million to $10 million, while in Maine, Troy Jackson raised $20.5 million to Susan Collins’ $5.2 million. Ohio’s Sherrod Brown raised $23.1 million to Jon Husted’s $4.8 million, and in Iowa, Josh Turek raised $13.9 million to Ashley Hinson’s $3.3 million. Alaska’s Mary Peltola raised $17 million to Dan Sullivan’s $2.7 million, and in Kansas, Adam Hamilton raised $9.9 million to Roger Marshall’s $866,000.
Across these 10 races, Democratic campaigns collectively raised more than five times the amount of their Republican counterparts. In some cases, a single Democratic candidate’s haul exceeded the total raised by all opposing Republicans combined. Several House Democratic challengers also raised over $3 million in the third quarter — surpassing the fundraising totals of multiple GOP Senate incumbents.
Republican candidates showed uneven financial strength. In Minnesota, Michele Tafoya raised $4.9 million to Peggy Flanagan’s $4.3 million. Sullivan, Husted, Hinson, Rogers, and Collins entered October with significantly more cash on hand than their Democratic opponents. Republicans have also benefited from substantial outside spending, including $131 million deployed by a Texas political action committee supporting Paxton, largely funded by Elon Musk, who contributed $158 million to Senate Republicans’ super PACs in the last quarter. Additional support comes from groups like MAGA Inc. and the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which has gained new flexibility to coordinate spending following a recent Supreme Court decision permitting party committees to spend unlimited sums in collaboration with candidates.
The latest Federal Election Commission filings, covering transactions through September 30, do not capture the full financial picture, as transfers to joint fundraising committees may not yet be reflected. Some Republican campaigns appear to be feeling the strain; for instance, Mike Whatley has paused television advertising despite asserting the pause is temporary. While Republican-aligned groups have outspent Democratic counterparts overall, the candidate-level fundraising gap underscores a challenging financial landscape for the GOP in the final stretch of the election cycle.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman announced on Monday that Stephen Cash will assume the role of director at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Cash, who spent more than four decades working for NASA before retiring, returns to lead the center where his career began in 1982.
"Marshall is a historic hub for propulsion research and development, and its work on the Space Launch System, human landing systems, and advanced propulsion technologies is central to the agency’s Artemis program," Isaacman said in a statement. "Steve Cash brings deep technical knowledge, decades of hands‑on experience with human spaceflight hardware, and a proven record of mission‑focused leadership. His return coincides with a period of rapid growth in nuclear power and propulsion research that will shape the next phase of exploration."
Amit Kshatriya, NASA associate administrator and chief engineer, added that effective center leadership requires a commitment to both people and technical excellence. "Steve understands that Marshall’s greatest asset is its workforce. By fostering opportunities for engineers to design, build, test, and iterate, he will help sustain the high‑performance culture needed for ambitious missions to the Moon and Mars," Kshatriya said.
In his new role, Cash will oversee a center employing more than 5,000 civil service and contractor personnel. The portfolio includes propulsion systems, space‑systems engineering, scientific research, and technology development. Marshall’s contributions to the Artemis program involve managing the SLS rocket, the Human Landing System, and related infrastructure that will enable sustained lunar exploration and future Mars missions.
Cash began his NASA career at Marshall in 1982, rising through senior engineering and management positions. He led the Space Shuttle Propulsion Office, directed the Safety and Mission Assurance Directorate from 2011 to 2016, and retired in 2016 after 34 years of service. After leaving NASA, he worked in the private aerospace sector, most recently as vice president for advanced space systems at Axient, and was inducted into the Alabama Engineering Hall of Fame in 2024.
He succeeds Rae Ann Meyer, who has served as acting director since September 2025. Meyer, formerly deputy center director, will revert to that position while continuing to provide oversight during the transition.
Marshall Space Flight Center, established in 1960, has been central to U.S. space exploration, from developing the Saturn rockets that powered the Apollo Moon landings to advancing propulsion technologies for current and future missions. For additional details, NASA’s Marshall page is available online.
George Alderman and Cheryl Warner, headquarters staff, and Lance Davis of the Marshall Center contributed to the announcement.
A U.S. Navy recovery team retrieved the Orion spacecraft from the Pacific Ocean on April 10, 2026, capturing underwater footage of its heat shield shortly after the Artemis II mission returned to Earth. Engineers later conducted a detailed assessment of the thermal protection system to verify its ability to withstand reentry temperatures and protect both the crew and internal systems. The analysis concluded that the shield functioned as designed, meeting all performance expectations. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to refine spacecraft safety protocols for future deep space missions.
Allison Mjoen, NASA's operations manager for the Exploration Ground Systems Program, stood with her family on April 1, 2026, as the Space Launch System ignited at Kennedy Space Center. The clear Florida morning drew a crowd that counted down alongside her children, who witnessed the culmination of two decades of her work supporting shuttle, station and now Artemis missions.
Mjoen's career began as a flight crew systems engineer for the Space Shuttle Program, where she managed cabin configurations including food, spacesuits and cargo. She later integrated experiments for the International Space Station and served as lead for Artemis vehicle processing before earning certification as an operations project engineer during integrated firing room tests for Artemis I.
"Every decision and communication directly supported the integrated team's ability to execute safely," Mjoen said of her role coordinating booster and Orion spacecraft operations. Her current responsibilities involve developing integration plans and overseeing ground operations that prepare Artemis vehicles for launch.
The launch moment offered reflection on how Artemis builds on Apollo's legacy of collective achievement. Mjoen noted that while Apollo demonstrated what was possible, Artemis aims to create a sustained presence on the Moon that future generations can share.
Her work continues to emphasize preparation, collaboration and trust across teams as NASA advances toward returning humans to the lunar surface.
This edition was assembled from neutral, full-length rewritten articles of the day's aggregated news.
Why it matters: Every article was reviewed for loaded language, partisan framing, and missing attribution before publication.
New York
22°C
Partly Cloudy
London
16°C
Mostly Cloudy
Tokyo
24°C
Sunny