NASA said June 30 it is evaluating a plan to convert an engineering model of a Mars rover into a lunar rover named PROMISE, which could cost more than $1 billion and may not launch before the early 2030s.
The rover would be based on Curiosity and Perseverance models used on Earth. NASA administrator Jared Isaacman announced the idea at a briefing, saying it would help the lunar base and make use of existing hardware. Program executive Carlos García‑Galán said the conversion could be done quickly and cheaply because the hardware already exists, though no cost estimate was provided.
An analysis by The Planetary Society published July 30 estimated that developing and launching PROMISE would cost between $723 million and $1.33 billion, including one year of lunar operations, and that the mission would not be ready for launch until the early 2030s. Casey Dreier, chief of space policy for The Planetary Society, said the mission would consume resources that could support other scientific priorities. The study noted that converting the Perseverance engineering model, called OPTIMISM, would require new communications systems, flight‑rated instruments, and a radioisotope thermoelectric generator. NASA currently has one spare RTG, but using it would require approval and possible modifications to the lander and launch vehicle. Dreier added that the mission would limit the availability of the RTG for other planetary science missions and could reduce the testbed available for Curiosity and Perseverance.
In a social‑media post on July 31, Isaacman responded that launch and landing costs are unavoidable and that even a fraction of the low‑end estimate would be too expensive. He also argued that repurposing taxpayer‑funded hardware and the remaining plutonium‑238 fuel makes sense, questioning how much of the fuel should be wasted on a mission that does not yet exist. Uncertainty about RTG availability is one reason NASA has not yet issued a call for proposals for its next New Frontiers planetary science mission, which is now expected in fiscal year 2027. At the July 21 Exploration Science Forum, planetary science division director Louise Prockter said the delay is linked to an ongoing assessment of potential missions and the availability of nuclear power, and that further information will be released soon.
The agency continues to assess the feasibility of nuclear power for future missions and the timeline for the New Frontiers call, while the cost and schedule for PROMISE remain unresolved.

