Emily Wilson, a classicist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania, published a critical review of Christopher Nolan's film adaptation of Homer's The Odyssey in the London Review of Books.
Wilson had previously examined the film's alterations to the source material and expressed concerns that the director prioritized breadth over core themes. The adaptation, released in 2023, earned $264.1 million worldwide in its opening weekend and $215.3 million in its second weekend, a 19 percent decline.
She described the film as a family‑friendly audiovisual spectacle that her teenage children enjoyed, but said it offered little narrative or emotional depth, comparing it to a fireworks display with minimal storytelling.
Wilson argued that the movie's narrative was confusing, its characters underdeveloped, and its motivations unclear, adding that the script failed to convey the poem's central concerns about time, memory, war, and the impact of a warrior’s return on his family and community.
She noted that the film lacked psychological, emotional, political, and ethical depth, that its narrative structure appeared gimmicky, and that the writing she judged to be weak.
Wilson also observed that the adaptation omitted several elements she considered essential to the original epic.
Despite her critique, she acknowledged that the film had succeeded in drawing audiences back to theaters and may encourage new readership of Homer’s work, a development she welcomed.
Box office data show the film's strong financial performance, with a global opening weekend total of $264.1 million and a second‑week total of $215.3 million.
Nolan had previously referenced Wilson’s translation of The Odyssey when speaking with Empire, indicating familiarity with her scholarship.
Whether the film will influence academic interest in the poem or prompt further scholarly critique remains to be seen.

